netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [next] igb: allow setting MAC address on i211 using a device tree blob V5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1456876509.3039.10.camel@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:55:09 -0800
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	John Holland <jotihojr@...il.com>,
	"Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [next] igb: allow setting MAC address on i211
 using a device tree blob V5

On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 07:56 +0100, John Holland wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2016, at 03:52, Brown, Aaron F <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > This throws a few checkpatch warnings, but I won't withhold my
> tested by for these:
> > 
> > total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 21 lines checked
> > 
> > Your patch has style problems, please review.
> > 
> > NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
> >      them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> > u1463:[0]/usr/src/kernels/next-queue>
> 
> Thanks for testing...
> 
> Do you require me to reformat the patch text? And won't that break
> the link?

No, that checkpatch.pl warning on the link you provided is fine,
although I will clean up your signed-off-by when I go to push it
upstream. :-)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)