lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5ANea=E2C+o-F5RxaX=LNg6hYiBCLJkaFwz4qp9qpjJTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:08:49 -0300
From:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:	Bernhard Walle <bernhard@...lle.de>
Cc:	Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fec: Add "phy-reset-active-low" property to DT

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Bernhard Walle <bernhard@...lle.de> wrote:

> Indeed, you're correct.
>
> Should I send a new patch or a patch that corrects my first patch?
> Because it already is in linux-next.

As your patch is already in linux-next you should send an incremental
patch then. Thanks

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ