[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5ANea=E2C+o-F5RxaX=LNg6hYiBCLJkaFwz4qp9qpjJTg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:08:49 -0300
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Bernhard Walle <bernhard@...lle.de>
Cc: Troy Kisky <troy.kisky@...ndarydevices.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fec: Add "phy-reset-active-low" property to DT
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Bernhard Walle <bernhard@...lle.de> wrote:
> Indeed, you're correct.
>
> Should I send a new patch or a patch that corrects my first patch?
> Because it already is in linux-next.
As your patch is already in linux-next you should send an incremental
patch then. Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists