lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1457196133.2663.3.camel@edumazet-ThinkPad-T530>
Date:	Sat, 05 Mar 2016 08:42:13 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:	network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>, daniel@...earbox.net,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: use gfp insteaad of GFP_NOWAIT in
 idr_alloc_cyclic when sctp_assoc_set_id

On sam., 2016-03-05 at 23:59 +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> The following call trace appears because of idr_alloc_cyclic(..., GFP_NOWAIT),
> that is a stress test, and the reason should be a heavy use. it will cause
> sctp_process_init return 0, and make connection init fail.
> 
> All the allocations of idr_alloc_cyclic should respect gfp flag.
> So we can fix it by using gfp insteaad of GFP_NOWAIT in idr_alloc_cyclic.
> 
> [ 2569.797532] Call Trace:
> [ 2569.809721]  [<ffffffff8163ed74>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> [ 2569.837424]  [<ffffffff81171460>] warn_alloc_failed+0x110/0x180
> [ 2569.867013]  [<ffffffff81175be8>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x9a8/0xb90
> [ 2569.900039]  [<ffffffff811b68d9>] alloc_pages_current+0xa9/0x170
> [ 2569.930100]  [<ffffffff811c19dc>] new_slab+0x2ec/0x300
> [ 2569.957505]  [<ffffffff8163bcdf>] __slab_alloc+0x315/0x48f
> [ 2569.985168]  [<ffffffff812f6bd9>] ? idr_layer_alloc+0x89/0x90
> [ 2570.014344]  [<ffffffff812fedae>] ? memzero_explicit+0xe/0x10
> [ 2570.044116]  [<ffffffff811c3fa3>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x193/0x1d0
> [ 2570.073283]  [<ffffffff812f6bd9>] idr_layer_alloc+0x89/0x90
> [ 2570.102684]  [<ffffffff812f72dc>] idr_get_empty_slot+0x24c/0x3c0
> [ 2570.132634]  [<ffffffff812f75ac>] idr_alloc+0x5c/0x100
> [ 2570.159835]  [<ffffffffa08af6c0>] ? sctp_hash_transport+0x110/0x290 [sctp]
> [ 2570.194974]  [<ffffffff812f767b>] idr_alloc_cyclic+0x2b/0x60
> [ 2570.223695]  [<ffffffffa089a546>] sctp_assoc_set_id+0x46/0xd0 [sctp]
> [ 2570.256245]  [<ffffffffa089f321>] sctp_process_init+0x921/0x940 [sctp]
> [ 2570.288574]  [<ffffffffa08ae030>] ? sctp_csum_combine+0x10/0x10 [sctp]
> [ 2570.321758]  [<ffffffffa0896788>] sctp_cmd_interpreter.isra.25+0xe18/0x1330 [sctp]
> [ 2570.459745]  [<ffffffffa089543f>] sctp_do_sm+0xaf/0x1b0 [sctp]
> [ 2570.489725]  [<ffffffffa0899655>] sctp_assoc_bh_rcv+0xd5/0x140 [sctp]
> [ 2570.522628]  [<ffffffffa08a137c>] sctp_inq_push+0x4c/0x70 [sctp]
> [ 2570.553812]  [<ffffffffa08af160>] sctp_backlog_rcv+0x40/0x130 [sctp]
> [ 2570.585534]  [<ffffffff8151cbe1>] release_sock+0xa1/0x170
> [ 2570.613632]  [<ffffffffa08a8c1a>] __sctp_connect+0x41a/0x550 [sctp]
> [ 2570.644998]  [<ffffffff810a84e0>] ? wake_up_atomic_t+0x30/0x30
> [ 2570.675601]  [<ffffffff816463f2>] ? _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x12/0x50
> [ 2570.705185]  [<ffffffffa08a8e6d>] sctp_connect+0x4d/0x70 [sctp]
> [ 2570.736234]  [<ffffffff815a82ce>] inet_dgram_connect+0x2e/0x80
> [ 2570.765514]  [<ffffffff81518387>] SYSC_connect+0xe7/0x120
> [ 2570.793691]  [<ffffffff81515450>] ? sock_alloc_file+0xa0/0x140
> [ 2570.822558]  [<ffffffff811ffad7>] ? __fd_install+0x47/0x60
> [ 2570.851732]  [<ffffffff8151943e>] SyS_connect+0xe/0x10
> [ 2570.877433]  [<ffffffff8164f1c9>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 2570.908682] SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1 (gfp=0x8000)
> [ 2570.939959]   cache: idr_layer_cache, object size: 2112, buffer size: 2112, default order: 3, min order: 0
> [ 2570.989683]   node 0: slabs: 839, objs: 11829, free: 0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> ---
>  net/sctp/associola.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
> index 2bf8ec9..481187a 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
> @@ -1606,7 +1606,7 @@ int sctp_assoc_set_id(struct sctp_association *asoc, gfp_t gfp)
>  		idr_preload(gfp);
>  	spin_lock_bh(&sctp_assocs_id_lock);
>  	/* 0 is not a valid assoc_id, must be >= 1 */
> -	ret = idr_alloc_cyclic(&sctp_assocs_id, asoc, 1, 0, GFP_NOWAIT);
> +	ret = idr_alloc_cyclic(&sctp_assocs_id, asoc, 1, 0, gfp);
>  	spin_unlock_bh(&sctp_assocs_id_lock);
>  	if (preload)
>  		idr_preload_end();

Are you sure idr_alloc(... GFP_KERNEL) makes sense inside spin_lock_bh()
section ?

idr_alloc() has :

might_sleep_if(gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask));

A debug kernel (CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y) should probably complain at
this point ?



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ