netdev - Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56DD7593.5060003@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:35:31 +0100
From:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
	LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement

Hi Heiko,

Am 07.03.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 13:17:54 schrieb Andreas Färber:
>> Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Andreas Färber:
>>> On next-20160304 the GMAC seems to have regressed, it no longer finds the
>>> PHY:
>>>
>>> libphy: PHY stmmac-0:ffffffff not found
>>> eth0: Could not attach to PHY
>>> stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19)
>>
>> Still with us in next-20160307. CC'ing stmmac maintainers.
> 
> do you remember from what revision you rebased away from, when it was still 
> working (as a known-good state)?

Hm, next-20160111 possibly... leaving all the 5 days and 4 days ago
changes as candidates ("stmmac: share reset function between dwmac100
and dwmac1000" .. "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression").

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)