[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56DD8176.2080603@st.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:26:14 +0100
From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
CC: <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] arm64: rockchip: Initial GeekBox enablement
Hello Andreas, Heiko,
On 3/7/2016 1:35 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi Heiko,
>
> Am 07.03.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
>> Am Montag, 7. März 2016, 13:17:54 schrieb Andreas Färber:
>>> Am 06.03.2016 um 20:53 schrieb Andreas Färber:
>>>> On next-20160304 the GMAC seems to have regressed, it no longer finds the
>>>> PHY:
>>>>
>>>> libphy: PHY stmmac-0:ffffffff not found
snps,phy-addr is not correct. Can you check it?
In the stmmac_mdio if this is not passed as parameter the bus should
be scanned and the first IDs found should select the right address.
I suppose in your box there is a real transceiver, so maybe the patch
from Gabriel is not actually necessary.
>>>> eth0: Could not attach to PHY
>>>> stmmac_open: Cannot attach to PHY (error: -19)
>>>
>>> Still with us in next-20160307. CC'ing stmmac maintainers.
peppe
>>
>> do you remember from what revision you rebased away from, when it was still
>> working (as a known-good state)?
>
> Hm, next-20160111 possibly... leaving all the 5 days and 4 days ago
> changes as candidates ("stmmac: share reset function between dwmac100
> and dwmac1000" .. "stmmac: Fix 'eth0: No PHY found' regression").
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists