netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: avoid copying junk bytes in bpf_get_current

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56E30FDE.3050702@fb.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Mar 2016 10:35:10 -0800
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
	Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bpf: avoid copying junk bytes in
 bpf_get_current_comm()

On 3/11/16 10:02 AM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Would strscpy() help in this case (see 30035e45753b ("string: provide
> strscpy()"))?

I've looked at it too, but 990486c8af04 scared me a little,
it's not easily backport-able and mainly I don't think
it's faster than strlcpy for small strings like comm.
memcpy going to be faster for sure.