netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 7/7] vxlan: allow setting ipv6 traffic class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:52:05 +0100
From:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 7/7] vxlan: allow setting ipv6 traffic class

On 03/16/2016 11:59 AM, Jiri Benc wrote:
[...]
>> @@ -1807,6 +1809,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *vxlan6_get_route(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan,
>>
>>   	memset(&fl6, 0, sizeof(fl6));
>>   	fl6.flowi6_oif = oif;
>> +	fl6.flowi6_tos = RT_TOS(tos);
>
> Nothing against this but the reason it was missing was that it's never
> used. Unless I'm missing something the IPv6 code does not use this
> field at all for lookups.
>
> This patch is not wrong but it's effectively dead code right now.
> I'll be happy to be proven wrong, though.

Hmm, you're right, thanks for pointing this out! Guess I shouldn't have
judged from geneve_get_v6_dst(), where this seems wrong as well ... If
noone is faster than me, I can make a patch removing these from both,
vxlan and geneve for the route lookup itself. Maybe the flowi6_tos define
should just be removed in general for the time being until there's real
support.

> (Sorry for answering after such long time, I'm catching up after a
> vacation.)
>
>   Jiri
>