netdev - Re: [PATCH (net-next.git) 2/2] stmmac: fix MDIO settings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56E9575B.5020702@st.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:53:47 +0100
From:	Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
To:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
	Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@...aro.org>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <fschaefer.oss@...glemail.com>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH (net-next.git) 2/2] stmmac: fix MDIO settings

Hello

On 3/16/2016 12:03 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 16.03.2016 um 12:01 schrieb Gabriel Fernandez:
>> Hi Pepe,
>>
>> i have a kernel crash
>>
>> [    2.714097] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
>> virtual address 000001d6
>> [    2.722188] pgd = c0204000
>> [    2.724886] [000001d6] *pgd=00000000
>> [    2.728452] Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] SMP ARM
>> [    2.733054] Modules linked in:
>> [    2.736095] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
>> 4.5.0-rc7-01768-g3407893 #36
>> [    2.743649] Hardware name: STiH415/416 SoC with Flattened Device Tree
>> [    2.750074] task: ee070000 ti: ee05e000 task.ti: ee05e000
>> [    2.755467] PC is at stmmac_open+0xcc/0xc40
>> [    2.759641] LR is at of_phy_connect+0x44/0x5c
>>
>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>> index 4c5ce98..943500b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>> @@ -278,7 +278,6 @@ static void stmmac_eee_ctrl_timer(unsigned long arg)
>>>    */
>>>   bool stmmac_eee_init(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
>>>   {
>>> -       char *phy_bus_name = priv->plat->phy_bus_name;
>>>          unsigned long flags;
>>>          bool ret = false;
>>>
>>> @@ -290,7 +289,7 @@ bool stmmac_eee_init(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
>>>                  goto out;
>>>
>>>          /* Never init EEE in case of a switch is attached */
>>> -       if (phy_bus_name && (!strcmp(phy_bus_name, "fixed")))
>>> +       if (priv->phydev->is_pseudo_fixed_link)
>>
>> priv->phydev is not yet affected
>> replace by if (phydev->is_pseudo_fixed_link) instead ?
>
> Indeed that's how I had it in my own patch before. Thanks for spotting.


thanks for spotting and I have just sent the V2 of these patches
and I have understood why I did not catch it on my test :-(
my fault, sorry !

Cheers
Peppe

>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>