netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: phy: at803x: don't depend on GPIOLIB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:55:14 +0100
From:	Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
CC:	Uwe Kleine-Koenig <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...il.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: at803x: don't depend on GPIOLIB

Hi Sergei,

On 03/23/2016 11:39 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>>          gpiod_reset = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset",
>> GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
> 
>    We shouldn't call _optional() then, should we?

I could imagine the original intention was to be backward compatible.

Indeed, if this call is not optional, systems using AT8030 and lacking a
reset line on DT will have their behaviour affected.
NOTE: they would still work because even if this driver fails to bind a
generic one will take over.

Best regards,

Sebastian