[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1459012726.6473.72.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 10:18:46 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Corcodel Marian <asd@...ian1000.go.ro>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 net-next v3.16]r8169: Disable set bit multicast
enable per multicast address.
On Sat, 2016-03-26 at 12:57 +0200, Corcodel Marian wrote:
> This patch correct set bit multicast enable only once per set_rx_mode
> invocation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corcodel Marian <asd@...ian1000.go.ro>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> index 7f6fb1f..f7b0dfb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
> @@ -4619,12 +4619,11 @@ static void rtl_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
> } else {
> struct netdev_hw_addr *ha;
>
> - rx_mode = AcceptBroadcast | AcceptMyPhys;
> + rx_mode = AcceptBroadcast | AcceptMyPhys | AcceptMulticast;
> mc_filter[1] = mc_filter[0] = 0;
> netdev_for_each_mc_addr(ha, dev) {
> int bit_nr = ether_crc(ETH_ALEN, ha->addr) >> 26;
> mc_filter[bit_nr >> 5] |= 1 << (bit_nr & 31);
> - rx_mode |= AcceptMulticast;
> }
> }
>
If the list is empty, why should we enable AcceptMulticast ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists