[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160330214535.4139ebe5@xhacker>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:45:35 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>, <mw@...ihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: mvneta: 64bit platform support
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 21:37:00 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Obviously, current mvneta driver can't work on 64bit platforms. For one thing
> the BM feature should be explicitly disabled, I just sent out one patch for
> this purpose.
>
> What's more, the buf_cookie in mvneta_rx_desc need to be carefully considered.
> The driver use the buf_cookie(u32 type) to store the buffer virtual address,
> obviously it can't store the virtual address on 64bit platforms. I have two
> solutions:
>
> solution A: let one reserved type in current mvneta_rx_desc, e.g reserved5
> to store the high 32bit virt address, and hack code as the following:
> #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> rx_desc->reserved5 = high32(data);
> #endif
oh, missing some code:
#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
data = ((u64)rx_desc->reserved5 << 32) | rx_desc->buf_cookie;
#else
data = (void*)rx_desc->buf_cookie;
#endif
>
> solution B: add one member void **buf_virt_ptrs in mvneta_rx_queue, and point
> all buf_cookie usage to the according buf_virt_ptrs[i]
>
>
> Is there any elegant solutions?
>
> Thanks,
> Jisheng
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists