[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160402015709.GA19365@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 09:57:10 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: aduyck@...antis.com, tom@...bertland.com, jesse@...nel.org,
alexander.duyck@...il.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [net PATCH 2/2] ipv4/GRO: Make GRO conform to RFC 6864
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I do not particularly care, but it is worth mentioning that GRO+TSO
> would not be idempotent anymore.
We could easily fix that by adding a feature bit to control this,
something like SKB_GSO_TCP_FIXEDID.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists