lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20160416.185342.1833113899705435419.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 18:53:42 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [net][PATCH v2 0/2] RDS: couple of fixes for 4.6 From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 10:43:25 -0700 > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ssantosh/linux.git for_4.6/net/rds-fixes I have no idea how you set this up, but there is no WAY this can be pulled from by me. When I try to pull it into 'net' I get 2690 objects. That means you didn't base it upon the 'net' tree which you must do. You can't base it upon Linus's tree, because if you do I'll get a ton of changes that are absolutely not appropriate to be pulled into my 'net' tree. Are you always doing this? Working against Linus's tree instead of mine?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists