[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5714EB23.5020102@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:11:47 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] qede: Add support for ethtool private flags
Hello.
On 4/17/2016 10:26 PM, Yuval Mintz wrote:
> Adds a getter for the interfaces private flags.
> The only parameter currently supported is whether the interface is a
> coupled function [required for supporting 100g].
>
> Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_ethtool.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_ethtool.c
> index f87e83b..5ba6b2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_ethtool.c
[...]
> @@ -185,6 +200,17 @@ static int qede_get_sset_count(struct net_device *dev, int stringset)
> }
> }
>
> +static u32 qede_get_priv_flags(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct qede_dev *edev = netdev_priv(dev);
> + u32 flags = 0;
> +
> + flags |= (!!(edev->dev_info.common.num_hwfns > 1)) <<
> + QEDE_PRI_FLAG_CMT;
Why not just '='?
> +
> + return flags;
... or direct return of the value above?
> +}
> +
> static int qede_get_settings(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_cmd *cmd)
> {
> struct qede_dev *edev = netdev_priv(dev);
[...]
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists