netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] qede: Add support for ethtool private flags

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CO2PR11MB0088E75B42A5F0901ED99CB1976B0@CO2PR11MB0088.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:34:53 +0000
From:	Yuval Mintz <Yuval.Mintz@...gic.com>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] qede: Add support for ethtool private flags

>> +     flags |= (!!(edev->dev_info.common.num_hwfns > 1)) <<
>> +              QEDE_PRI_FLAG_CMT;

>  Why not just '='?

>> +
>> +     return flags;

>  ... or direct return of the value above?

Probably wanted to lay the basis for future flags.
But you're right in that there's no need for it.
I'll change it in V2.

Thanks,
Yuval