[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160428142832.GD5995@atomide.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:28:32 -0700
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: "David Rivshin (Allworx)" <drivshin.allworx@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Markus Brunner <systemprogrammierung.brunner@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>,
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodbody@...brionix.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 0/5] drivers: net: cpsw: phy-handle fixes
* David Rivshin (Allworx) <drivshin.allworx@...il.com> [160427 18:13]:
> From: David Rivshin <drivshin@...worx.com>
>
> This series fixes a number of related issues around using phy-handle
> properties in cpsw emac nodes.
>
> Patch 1 fixes a bug if more than one slave is used, and either
> slave uses the phy-handle property in the devicetree.
>
> Patch 2 fixes a NULL pointer dereference which can occur if a
> phy-handle property is used and of_phy_connect() return NULL,
> such as with a bad devicetree.
>
> Patch 3 fixes an issue where the phy-mode property would be ignored
> if a phy-handle property was used. This also fixes a bogus error
> message that would be emitted.
>
> Patch 4 fixes makes the binding documentation more explicit that
> exactly one PHY property should be used, and also marks phy_id as
> deprecated.
>
> Patch 5 cleans up the fixed-link case to work like the now-fixed
> phy-handle case.
>
> I have tested on the following hardware configurations:
> - (EVMSK) dual emac, phy_id property in both slaves
> - (EVMSK) dual emac, phy-handle property in both slaves
> - (EVMSK) a bad phy-handle property pointing to &mmc1
> - (EVMSK) phy_id property with incorrect PHY address
> - (BeagleBoneBlack) single emac, phy_id property
> - (custom) single emac, fixed-link subnode
>
> Andrew Goodbody reported testing v2 on a board that doesn't use
> dual_emac mode, but with 2 PHYs using phy-handle properties [1].
>
> Nicolas Chauvet reported testing v2 on an HP t410 (dm8148).
>
> Markus Brunner reported testing v1 on the following [2]:
> - emac0 with phy_id and emac1 with fixed phy
> - emac0 with phy-handle and emac1 with fixed phy
> - emac0 with fixed phy and emac1 with fixed phy
Quickly boot tested these against next on dra62x-j5eco EVM:
Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists