[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5721E248.6040106@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:43:28 +0530
From: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
To: "David Rivshin (Allworx)" <drivshin.allworx@...il.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodbody@...brionix.com>,
Markus Brunner <systemprogrammierung.brunner@...il.com>,
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 4/5] dt: cpsw: phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link
are mutually exclusive
On Thursday 28 April 2016 07:12 AM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
> From: David Rivshin <drivshin@...worx.com>
>
> The phy-handle, phy_id, and fixed-link properties are mutually exclusive,
> and only one need be specified. Make this clear in the binding doc.
>
> Also mark the phy_id property as deprecated, as phy-handle should be
> used instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rivshin <drivshin@...worx.com>
Reviewed-by: Mugunthan V N <mugunthanvnm@...com>
Regards
Mugunthan V N
Powered by blists - more mailing lists