[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5723D676.30601@fb.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:47:34 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/7] tcp: do not block bh during prequeue
processing
On 4/29/16 2:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> AFAIK, nothing in current TCP stack absolutely wants BH
> being disabled once socket is owned by a thread running in
> process context.
>
> As mentioned in my prior patch ("tcp: give prequeue mode some care"),
> processing a batch of packets might take time, better not block BH
> at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet<edumazet@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh<soheil@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists