lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5723D676.30601@fb.com>
Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2016 14:47:34 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/7] tcp: do not block bh during prequeue
 processing

On 4/29/16 2:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> AFAIK, nothing in current TCP stack absolutely wants BH
> being disabled once socket is owned by a thread running in
> process context.
>
> As mentioned in my prior patch ("tcp: give prequeue mode some care"),
> processing a batch of packets might take time, better not block BH
> at all.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet<edumazet@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh<soheil@...gle.com>

Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ