[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160429.161208.1214717753456694357.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:12:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
stephen@...workplumber.org, jhs@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/5] bridge: per-vlan stats
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 21:49:17 +0200
> Because that is not needed for the per-vlan stats to work, I did to
> unify the paths and simplify the pvid code but I can easily drop it
> and revert back to using the direct pvid id. The only fetch will be
> the stats per-cpu pointer then. Would that be acceptable ?
It would be a step in the right direction, for sure.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists