netdev - Re: [PATCH] pxa168_eth: fix mdiobus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57266638.6030704@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Sun, 1 May 2016 23:25:28 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	arnd@...db.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pxa168_eth: fix mdiobus_scan() error check

Hello.

On 05/01/2016 07:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:

>> Since mdiobus_scan() returns either an error code or NULL on error, the
>> driver should check  for both,  not only for NULL, otherwise a crash is
>> imminent...
>>
>> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
>>
>> ---
>> The patch is against DaveM's 'net.git' repo.
>>
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/pxa168_eth.c |    2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: net/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/pxa168_eth.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- net.orig/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/pxa168_eth.c
>> +++ net/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/pxa168_eth.c
>> @@ -979,6 +979,8 @@ static int pxa168_init_phy(struct net_de
>>   		return 0;
>>
>>   	pep->phy = mdiobus_scan(pep->smi_bus, pep->phy_addr);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(pep->phy))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(pep->phy);
>>   	if (!pep->phy)
>>   		return -ENODEV;
>
> Should not this check be removed too and

    That's my next move -- for now I'm fixing the existing bug in this driver 
only.

> converted to a PTR_ERR(pep->phy) != -ENODEV?

    I don't see what that would achieve, IMO it's enough to just drop this 
*if* altogether.

MBR, Sergei