[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1462250965.5535.286.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 21:49:25 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] tcp: guarantee forward progress in tcp_sendmsg()
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Under high rx pressure, it is possible tcp_sendmsg() never has a
chance to allocate an skb and loop forever as sk_flush_backlog()
would always return true.
Fix this by calling sk_flush_backlog() only if one skb had been
allocated and filled before last backlog check.
Fixes: d41a69f1d390 ("tcp: make tcp_sendmsg() aware of socket backlog")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index b945c2b046c5ead5503505f250c3c67761b284ae..5c7ed147449c1b7ba029b12e033ad779a631460a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -1084,6 +1084,7 @@ int tcp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
struct sockcm_cookie sockc;
int flags, err, copied = 0;
int mss_now = 0, size_goal, copied_syn = 0;
+ bool process_backlog = false;
bool sg;
long timeo;
@@ -1167,9 +1168,10 @@ new_segment:
if (!sk_stream_memory_free(sk))
goto wait_for_sndbuf;
- if (sk_flush_backlog(sk))
+ if (process_backlog && sk_flush_backlog(sk)) {
+ process_backlog = false;
goto restart;
-
+ }
skb = sk_stream_alloc_skb(sk,
select_size(sk, sg),
sk->sk_allocation,
@@ -1177,6 +1179,7 @@ new_segment:
if (!skb)
goto wait_for_memory;
+ process_backlog = true;
/*
* Check whether we can use HW checksum.
*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists