netdev - Re: NFSroot hangs with bad unlock balance in Linux next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160509153932.GJ2694@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 9 May 2016 16:39:33 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: NFSroot hangs with bad unlock balance in Linux next

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 08:21:38AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:

> Looks like with both patches applied I still also get this eventually:
> 
> =====================================
> [ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
> 4.6.0-rc7-next-20160509+ #1264 Not tainted
> -------------------------------------

Lockdep warnings are noise.  To make them STFU try the following incremental;
I'll fold it into #work.lookups and #for-next.  Note that it will do nothing
to hangs - those are completely unrelated and you need Eric's patch to deal
with them.

diff --git a/fs/nfs/unlink.c b/fs/nfs/unlink.c
index d367b06..1868246 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/unlink.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/unlink.c
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static void nfs_async_unlink_release(void *calldata)
 	struct dentry *dentry = data->dentry;
 	struct super_block *sb = dentry->d_sb;
 
-	up_read(&NFS_I(d_inode(dentry->d_parent))->rmdir_sem);
+	up_read_non_owner(&NFS_I(d_inode(dentry->d_parent))->rmdir_sem);
 	d_lookup_done(dentry);
 	nfs_free_unlinkdata(data);
 	dput(dentry);
@@ -117,10 +117,10 @@ static int nfs_call_unlink(struct dentry *dentry, struct nfs_unlinkdata *data)
 	struct inode *dir = d_inode(dentry->d_parent);
 	struct dentry *alias;
 
-	down_read(&NFS_I(dir)->rmdir_sem);
+	down_read_non_owner(&NFS_I(dir)->rmdir_sem);
 	alias = d_alloc_parallel(dentry->d_parent, &data->args.name, &data->wq);
 	if (IS_ERR(alias)) {
-		up_read(&NFS_I(dir)->rmdir_sem);
+		up_read_non_owner(&NFS_I(dir)->rmdir_sem);
 		return 0;
 	}
 	if (!d_in_lookup(alias)) {
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ static int nfs_call_unlink(struct dentry *dentry, struct nfs_unlinkdata *data)
 			ret = 0;
 		spin_unlock(&alias->d_lock);
 		dput(alias);
-		up_read(&NFS_I(dir)->rmdir_sem);
+		up_read_non_owner(&NFS_I(dir)->rmdir_sem);
 		/*
 		 * If we'd displaced old cached devname, free it.  At that
 		 * point dentry is definitely not a root, so we won't need