netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ifb: support more features

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1462815712.23934.36.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 09 May 2016 10:41:52 -0700
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevic@...hat.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] ifb: support more features

On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 10:39 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 10:22 -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> 
> > One thought that just occurred to me based on this would be to
> > configure inner headers on the way up, and to configure the outer
> > headers on the way down.  Then that way we could go through and be
> > guaranteed that the inner headers represent the inner most set of
> > header offsets, and the outer ones represent the outer-most set
> > regardless of the total number of headers present and there would be
> > no need to call into the reset_headers function since all the headers
> > would already be set.
> > 
> > I was also looking at possibly dropping the inner transport offset as
> > from what I can tell it and the csum_offset should always be the same
> > value since csum_offset will always point to the inner transport
> > header when any kind of offload is enabled which is the criteria for
> > skb->encapsulation being set anyway.
> 
> Ideally nothing should be changed in the source skb while doing
> gso_segment() calls.
> 
> As we did in gro_complete() when adding nhoff argument, we probably
> could pass the current offset and not touch skb->data and various header
> offsets.

Ugly things like skb_gso_error_unwind() would then disappear.

What a mess it is.