lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160512094725.GB1777@salvia>
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2016 11:47:25 +0200
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, dale.4d@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf V2] netfilter: fix oops in nfqueue during netns error
 unwinding

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:41:13PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> index 5baa8e2..9722819 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
> @@ -102,6 +102,13 @@ void nf_queue_nf_hook_drop(struct net *net, struct nf_hook_ops *ops)
>  {
>  	const struct nf_queue_handler *qh;
>  
> +	/* netns wasn't initialized, error unwind in progress.
> +	 * Its possible that the nfq netns init function was not even
> +	 * called, in which case nfq pernetns data is in undefined state.
> +	 */
> +	if (!net->list.next)
> +		return;

Thanks Florian.

Question for the netns folks: Is this a stable assumption? My only
concern with this is that it relies on internal the netns
representation, so I'd like to make sure this thing doesn't break
again.

Let me know, thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ