lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2016 11:15:24 -0500
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	dale.4d@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf V2] netfilter: fix oops in nfqueue during netns error unwinding

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> writes:

> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:41:13PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
>> index 5baa8e2..9722819 100644
>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_queue.c
>> @@ -102,6 +102,13 @@ void nf_queue_nf_hook_drop(struct net *net, struct nf_hook_ops *ops)
>>  {
>>  	const struct nf_queue_handler *qh;
>>  
>> +	/* netns wasn't initialized, error unwind in progress.
>> +	 * Its possible that the nfq netns init function was not even
>> +	 * called, in which case nfq pernetns data is in undefined state.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!net->list.next)
>> +		return;
>
> Thanks Florian.
>
> Question for the netns folks: Is this a stable assumption? My only
> concern with this is that it relies on internal the netns
> representation, so I'd like to make sure this thing doesn't break
> again.
>
> Let me know, thanks.

Ugh. I got distracted before I finished replying.

I don't think the analysis is correct.

The unwind and the netns exit path should maintain the same constraints.
If they don't there is a bug, perhaps in initialization ordering.

Code should be able to count on net_generic() from the beginning of the
corresponding .init to the end of the corresponding .fini

Something like that is not happening and if we can I would like to track
down why.

Otherwise we need code like the above all over the place.

Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists