netdev - Re: networking/ip-sysctl.txt: SRR or SSRR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.12.1605112154070.3193@trent.utfs.org>
Date:	Wed, 11 May 2016 21:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: networking/ip-sysctl.txt: SRR or SSRR

On Tue, 10 May 2016, David Miller wrote:
> Every single variable name and function name dealing with this IP
> option uses "srr", therefore I don't think we should adjust the
> documentation either.
> 
> "srr" covers both the loose source route option and the strict source
> route option.

Now that I know where the 2nd "r" comes from, the "srr" makes sense. So 
yeah, SRR it is. Maybe a hint to the correct RFC would help, but if nobody 
else complained yet, I guess it's not really worth the commit.

Thanks,
Christian.
-- 
BOFH excuse #255:

Standing room only on the bus.