[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160516.134720.895829616600822039.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 13:47:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: minor optimizations around tcp_hdr()
usage
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:16:40 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> tcp_hdr() is slightly more expensive than using skb->data in contexts
> where we know they point to the same byte.
>
> In receive path, tcp_v4_rcv() and tcp_v6_rcv() are in this situation,
> as tcp header has not been pulled yet.
>
> In output path, the same can be said when we just pushed the tcp header
> in the skb, in tcp_transmit_skb() and tcp_make_synack()
>
> Also factorize the two checks for tcb->tcp_flags & TCPHDR_SYN in
> tcp_transmit_skb() and pass tcp header pointer to tcp_ecn_send(),
> so that compiler can further optimize and avoid a reload.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists