[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160518210943.GA771@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 17:09:43 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: suppress warnings on dev_alloc_skb
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:48:15PM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:57:21AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 11:25 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> >> >> Noticed an allocation failure in a network driver the other day on a 32 bit
> >> >> system:
> >> >>
> >> >> DMA-API: debugging out of memory - disabling
> >> >> bnx2fc: adapter_lookup: hba NULL
> >> >> lldpad: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x4120
> >> >> Pid: 4556, comm: lldpad Not tainted 2.6.32-639.el6.i686.debug #1
> >> >> Call Trace:
> >> >> [<c08a4086>] ? printk+0x19/0x23
> >> >> [<c05166a4>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x664/0x830
> >> >> [<c0649d02>] ? free_object+0x82/0xa0
> >> >> [<fb4e2c9b>] ? ixgbe_alloc_rx_buffers+0x10b/0x1d0 [ixgbe]
> >> >> [<fb4e2fff>] ? ixgbe_configure_rx_ring+0x29f/0x420 [ixgbe]
> >> >> [<fb4e228c>] ? ixgbe_configure_tx_ring+0x15c/0x220 [ixgbe]
> >> >> [<fb4e3709>] ? ixgbe_configure+0x589/0xc00 [ixgbe]
> >> >> [<fb4e7be7>] ? ixgbe_open+0xa7/0x5c0 [ixgbe]
> >> >> [<fb503ce6>] ? ixgbe_init_interrupt_scheme+0x5b6/0x970 [ixgbe]
> >> >> [<fb4e8e54>] ? ixgbe_setup_tc+0x1a4/0x260 [ixgbe]
> >> >> [<fb505a9f>] ? ixgbe_dcbnl_set_state+0x7f/0x90 [ixgbe]
> >> >> [<c088d80d>] ? dcb_doit+0x10ed/0x16d0
> >> >> ...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Well, maybe this call site (via ixgbe_configure_rx_ring()) should be
> >> > using GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC.
> >>
> >> The problem is the ixgbe driver is using the same function for
> >> allocating memory in the softirq and in the init. As such it has to
> >> default to GFP_ATOMIC so that it doesn't screw up the NAPI allocation
> >> case.
> >>
> >
> > I suppose a happy medium would be to extend dev_alloc_pages to accept a gfp
> > argument, and then have the function itself only set __GFP_NOWARN, if ATOMIC is
> > also set?
>
> Why bother? I really think Eric's patch is the way to go.
>
> We can already pass gfp flags to __dev_alloc_pages so if we need to
> pass flags we can use that. Otherwise for the users of dev_alloc_page
> and dev_alloc_pages we can just pass GFP_ATOMIC | __GFP_NOWARN like
> Eric did in his example patch.
>
> - Alex
>
Oh, my bad, I misread what he was saying. Yeah, thats the way to go.
Neil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists