lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160518211829.GA57390@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 May 2016 14:18:31 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bpf: rather use get_random_int for randomizations

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 07:17:48AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:28 +0200, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> 
> > I don't consider this a big thing, I just mentioned that we probably
> > shouldn't use prandom_u32 if the value somehow could leak to user space
> > and should be used for security.
> 
> Yes, I was mostly trying to understand if you had real security issues
> there or some general concerns ;)

agree with Eric. Frankly I wouldn't do it, but since it's a trivial
patch and if it makes security folks less worried then why not.
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ