[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160520.192617.407123677086722342.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 19:26:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: aduyck@...antis.com
Cc: tom@...bertland.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] Follow-ups for GUEoIPv6 patches
From: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 10:44:40 -0700
> This patch series is meant to be applied after:
> [PATCH v7 net-next 00/16] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes for v6 tunneling
>
> The first patch addresses an issue we already resolved in the GREv4 and is
> now present in GREv6 with the introduction of FOU/GUE for IPv6 based GRE
> tunnels.
>
> The second patch goes through and enables IPv6 tunnel offloads for the Intel
> NICs that already support the IPv4 based IP-in-IP tunnel offloads. I have
> only done a bit of touch testing but have seen ~20 Gb/s over an i40e
> interface using a v4-in-v6 tunnel, and I have verified IPv6 GRE is still
> passing traffic at around the same rate. I plan to do further testing but
> with these patches present it should enable a wider audience to be able to
> test the new features introduced in Tom's patchset with hardware offloads.
Series applied, thanks Alex.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists