lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4f11914a-f5cc-3df4-5b9d-0946f9f31ec2@stressinduktion.org>
Date:	Sat, 21 May 2016 01:27:42 +0200
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bpf: Use mount_nodev not mount_ns to mount the bpf
 filesystem

On 21.05.2016 00:22, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> While reviewing the filesystems that set FS_USERNS_MOUNT I spotted the
> bpf filesystem.  Looking at the code I saw a broken usage of mount_ns
> with current->nsproxy->mnt_ns. As the code does not acquire a
> reference to the mount namespace it can not possibly be correct to
> store the mount namespace on the superblock as it does.
> 
> Replace mount_ns with mount_nodev so that each mount of the bpf
> filesystem returns a distinct instance, and the code is not buggy.
> 
> In discussion with Hannes Frederic Sowa it was reported that the use
> of mount_ns was an attempt to have one bpf instance per mount
> namespace, in an attempt to keep resources that pin resources from
> hiding.  That intent simply does not work, the vfs is not built to
> allow that kind of behavior.  Which means that the bpf filesystem
> really is buggy both semantically and in it's implemenation as it does
> not nor can it implement the original intent.
> 
> This change is userspace visible, but my experience with similar
> filesystems leads me to believe nothing will break with a model of each
> mount of the bpf filesystem is distinct from all others.
> 
> Fixes: b2197755b263 ("bpf: add support for persistent maps/progs")
> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>

Thanks Eric!


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ