netdev - Re: [net PATCH 1/1] net sched actions: policer missing timestamp processing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWhRRqJWNaRXbFSPEVu+CTSb++z8A5Y3SB-vjmk1-gXmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 May 2016 13:52:07 -0700
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net PATCH 1/1] net sched actions: policer missing timestamp processing

On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
> @@ -340,6 +345,11 @@ tcf_act_police_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct tc_action *a, int bind, int ref)
>         if (police->tcfp_ewma_rate &&
>             nla_put_u32(skb, TCA_POLICE_AVRATE, police->tcfp_ewma_rate))
>                 goto nla_put_failure;
> +
> +       tcf_tm_dump(&t, &police->tcf_tm);

This depends on a previous patch you sent, right?