netdev - Re: [PATCH] soreuseport: add compat case for setsockopt SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 23:09:41 +0200
From:	Helge Deller <deller@....de>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	Craig Gallek <kraig@...gle.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	"linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soreuseport: add compat case for setsockopt
 SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF

On 03.06.2016 20:11, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 06/03/2016 08:18 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
> 
>> Commit 538950a ("soreuseport: setsockopt SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_[CE]BPF")
> 
>    At least 12 digits must be specified for SHA1. checkpatch.pl should've caught this.

Ok.

>> missed to add the compat case for the SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF
>> setsockoption() option.
>>
>> Since both SO_ATTACH_FILTER and SO_ATTACH_REUSEPORT_CBPF use a struct
>> sock_fprog let's combine the handling of both.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de>
>>
>> diff --git a/net/compat.c b/net/compat.c
>> index 5cfd26a..7e2aac9 100644
>> --- a/net/compat.c
>> +++ b/net/compat.c
>> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ void scm_detach_fds_compat(struct msghdr *kmsg, struct scm_cookie *scm)
>>      __scm_destroy(scm);
>>  }
>>
>> -static int do_set_attach_filter(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>> +static int do_sockopt_fix_sock_fprog(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
>>                  char __user *optval, unsigned int optlen)
> 
>    You need to realign this line now.

Sure, I will send an updated patch.

Any idea for a better naming than "do_sockopt_fix_sock_fprog()" ?

Helge