[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160621170333.GD19797@orbyte.nwl.cc>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:03:33 +0200
From: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
To: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemming@...cade.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Julien Floret <julien.floret@...nd.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH v2 2/7] Use C99 style initializers everywhere
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:24:37AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/21/16 10:18 AM, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > This big patch was compiled by vimgrepping for memset calls and changing
> > to C99 initializer if applicable. One notable exception is the
> > initialization of union bpf_attr in tc/tc_bpf.c: changing it would break
> > for older gcc versions (at least <=3.4.6).
> >
> > Calls to memset for struct rtattr pointer fields for parse_rtattr*()
> > were just dropped since they are not needed.
> >
> > The changes here allowed the compiler to discover some unused variables,
> > so get rid of them, too.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
> > ---
> > Changes since v1:
> > - Dropped former changes to tc/tc_bpf.c as they are incompatible to older
> > gcc versions (at least <=3.4.6).
>
>
> What OS versions have you compiled iproute2 against?
Tested on Gentoo with old compiler installed, so apart from gcc the
system is up to date.
> I downloaded CentOS 5 and 6. iproute2 fails to compile on CentOS 5.11;
> ip command builds on 6.8 but with a flurry of redefinition errors
> (BUILD_BUG_ON), but fails at tc.
What's the exact error message please? Maybe some incompatibility in
kernel headers? Although that shouldn't be ...
Cheers, Phil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists