[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160621095343.0936eefc@xeon-e3>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 09:53:43 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemming@...cade.com>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
CC: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Julien Floret <julien.floret@...nd.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [iproute PATCH v2 7/7] ip/tcp_metrics: Simplify process_msg a
bit
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:18:41 +0200
Phil Sutter <phil@....cc> wrote:
> By combining the attribute extraction and check for existence, the
> additional indentation level in the 'else' clause can be avoided.
>
> In addition to that, common actions for 'daddr' are combined since the
> function returns if neither of the branches are taken.
>
> Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>
> ---
> ip/tcp_metrics.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ip/tcp_metrics.c b/ip/tcp_metrics.c
> index f82604f458ada..899830c127bcb 100644
> --- a/ip/tcp_metrics.c
> +++ b/ip/tcp_metrics.c
> @@ -112,47 +112,38 @@ static int process_msg(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n,
> parse_rtattr(attrs, TCP_METRICS_ATTR_MAX, (void *) ghdr + GENL_HDRLEN,
> len);
>
> - a = attrs[TCP_METRICS_ATTR_ADDR_IPV4];
> - if (a) {
> + if ((a = attrs[TCP_METRICS_ATTR_ADDR_IPV4])) {
NAK, plus it fails checkpatch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists