[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87oa6tmxgo.fsf@frog.home>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:36:39 +0200
From: Jakub Sitnicki <jkbs@...hat.com>
To: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Enable use of extra debugging information
Hi David,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 01:27 AM CEST, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
> Add -g flag to builds if DEBUG parameter is set. Improves
> debugging with gdb.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> ---
> Makefile | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 15c81ecfdca3..8e006759079d 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -39,7 +39,11 @@ HOSTCC = gcc
> DEFINES += -D_GNU_SOURCE
> # Turn on transparent support for LFS
> DEFINES += -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
> +ifdef DEBUG
> +CCOPTS = -g
> +else
> CCOPTS = -O2
> +endif
> WFLAGS := -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> WFLAGS += -Wmissing-declarations -Wold-style-definition -Wformat=2
This implies a change of optimization level to -O0 when building with
DEBUG set, doesn't it? Was it intentional?
Perhaps it would be less surprising to explicitly set -O0, if that was
your intention. Just a thought.
Thanks,
Jakub
Powered by blists - more mailing lists