[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7d1368f-c71e-d2fe-bf79-caa631f4ecc9@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:55:34 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jkbs@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2] Enable use of extra debugging information
On 6/22/16 2:36 AM, Jakub Sitnicki wrote:
>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> index 15c81ecfdca3..8e006759079d 100644
>> --- a/Makefile
>> +++ b/Makefile
>> @@ -39,7 +39,11 @@ HOSTCC = gcc
>> DEFINES += -D_GNU_SOURCE
>> # Turn on transparent support for LFS
>> DEFINES += -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
>> +ifdef DEBUG
>> +CCOPTS = -g
>> +else
>> CCOPTS = -O2
>> +endif
>> WFLAGS := -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
>> WFLAGS += -Wmissing-declarations -Wold-style-definition -Wformat=2
>
> This implies a change of optimization level to -O0 when building with
> DEBUG set, doesn't it? Was it intentional?
yes it is intentional.
> Perhaps it would be less surprising to explicitly set -O0, if that was
> your intention. Just a thought.
>
> Thanks,
> Jakub
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists