netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tou: Transports over UDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160622.152408.1343255136815304537.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:24:08 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dsa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc:	hkchu@...gle.com, tom@...bertland.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tou: Transports over UDP - part I

From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:06:01 -0600

> On 6/21/16 9:42 PM, Jerry Chu wrote:
>> Yes TOU may lower the bar for random hacks by Joe Random. But I'd
>> argue
>> no large organization would serious consider or dare deploy TCP stack
>> with random hacks.
> 
> There are userspace network stacks that have been around for years and
> widely deployed on devices that basically use Linux as the boot OS.

I'm not talking about TCP stacks that are trying to do things right.