netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tou: Transports over UDP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFLxGvwmhTv0rTuDpg7r1vZ0GEU93j1QxV12mJ2c2W2qSJGRCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:15:04 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/8] tou: Transports over UDP - part I

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com> wrote:
> Transports over UDP is intended to encapsulate TCP and other transport
> protocols directly and securely in UDP.
>
> The goal of this work is twofold:
>
> 1) Allow applications to run their own transport layer stack (i.e.from
>    userspace). This eliminates dependencies on the OS (e.g. solves a
>    major dependency issue for Facebook on clients).

Facebook on clients would be a Facebook app on mobile devices?
Does that mean that the Facebook app is so advanced and complicated
that it needs a special TCP stack?!

-- 
Thanks,
//richard