netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] can: fix oops caused by wrong rtnl dellink usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0e51107f-a381-6c94-0079-d0ed415d8bcc@hartkopp.net>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:01:23 +0200
From:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...gutronix.de, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] can: fix oops caused by wrong rtnl dellink usage



On 06/23/2016 02:55 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 6/23/2016 12:22 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
>
>> From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
>>
>> For 'real' hardware CAN devices the netlink interface is used to set CAN
>> specific communication parameters. Real CAN hardware can not be
>> created nor
>> removed with the ip tool ...
>>
>> This patch adds a private dellink function for the CAN device driver
>> interface
>> that does just nothing.
>>
>> It's a follow up to commit 993e6f2fd ("can: fix oops caused by wrong rtnl
>> newlink usage") but for dellink.
>>
>> Reported-by: ajneu <ajneu1@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/can/dev.c | 6 ++++++
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/dev.c b/drivers/net/can/dev.c
>> index 348dd5001fa4..ad535a854e5c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/dev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/dev.c
>> @@ -1011,6 +1011,11 @@ static int can_newlink(struct net *src_net,
>> struct net_device *dev,
>>      return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>  }
>>
>> +static void can_dellink(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
>> +{
>> +    return;
>
>    Why?
>

http://marc.info/?l=linux-can&m=146651600421205&w=2

The same reason as for commit 993e6f2fd.

Regards,
Oliver

>> +}
>> +
>>  static struct rtnl_link_ops can_link_ops __read_mostly = {
>>      .kind        = "can",
>>      .maxtype    = IFLA_CAN_MAX,
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergei
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-can" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html