[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMhYvFk66ZPPb3qtPM7NhPbCtAvPWSTKe528bO-k1QUjJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 17:33:47 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Shani Michaeli <shanim@...lanox.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...lanox.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
Carol L Soto <clsoto@...ibm.com>,
Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] mlx4: set csum_complete_sw bit when fixing complete csum
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Tariq Toukan <ttoukan.linux@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Cong,
>
>> See below. Does commit f8c6455bb04b944edb69e rely on any firmware
>> change to get an expected checksum?
>>
>> $ lspci -nn | grep -i mellanox
>> 82:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Mellanox Technologies MT27500
>> Family [ConnectX-3] [15b3:1003]
>>
>> $ ethtool -i eth0
>> driver: mlx4_en
>> version: 2.2-1 (Feb 2014)
>> firmware-version: 2.33.5220
>> bus-info: 0000:82:00.0
>
> I used same HW and FW, but was not able to reproduce.
> I have kernel HEAD of net-next: 8a79813c1401 net: ethernet: dwc_eth_qos: use
> phy_ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings
>
> I ran regular ping, and ping6. Checksum complete counter increases, but no
> warnings in dmesg.
> What kernel do you use? Does it repro on latest net-next?
Also, can you share us somehow (e.g send to us as attachment, your
compressed .config)
Or.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists