[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMhtPNtcjKCW8cu9nMS04KNnMxs+XzqvQMWntxLJ_mr7YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:24:58 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Hadar Hen-Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
Tal Anker <Ankertal@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/16] net/devlink: Add E-Switch mode control
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
> Why not to have 2 modes:
> 1) lagacy - the current solution, blackbox eswitch, undefined behaviour
> 2) switchdev - with representors, all features possible as on physical
> switches, whitebox eswitch configured using standard tools?
yep, this makes sense to me. I will rename the offloads mode to be
called switchdev
and we'll respin V2 with few more small fixes and clarification on the
change log of this patch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists