[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1467296892.11238.24.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:28:12 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Mohamad Haj Yahia <mohamad@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: poll tx timeout only on active tx queues
On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 16:58 +0300, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> From: Mohamad Haj Yahia <mohamad@...lanox.com>
>
> Change the netdev watchdog to poll only the real active tx queues
> instead of polling all tx queues.
> The netdev driver doesn't necessarily have to start/stop all the
> tx queues including the inactive tx queues.
>
> Fixes: fd2ea0a79faa ('net: Use queue aware tests throughout.')
> Signed-off-by: Mohamad Haj Yahia <mohamad@...lanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> ---
> net/sched/sch_generic.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_generic.c b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> index f9e0e9c..a10f0ff 100644
> --- a/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static void dev_watchdog(unsigned long arg)
> unsigned int i;
> unsigned long trans_start;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < dev->num_tx_queues; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < dev->real_num_tx_queues; i++) {
> struct netdev_queue *txq;
>
> txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, i);
Strange, why don't you change all others helpers that are using
num_tx_queues ?
Which driver had a problem with this code ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists