[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160705225203.GE28825@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 00:52:03 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: Suffix function manipulating
device_node with _dn
> That is true for the devices I know about, both in and out of tree,
> however, while discussing offline with Vivien it seemed like there was a
> potential need for having a x86-based platform which could need that,
> Vivien do you think this platform could be in-tree one day (if not already)?
x86 can do device tree. And if it is a complex board, it probably
needs more of the device tree features like fixed-phys, phy-mode,
devlink when it lands, etc.
If this board really does come to mainline, we should consider support
for it, one way or the other, but until then, i prefer KISS.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists