[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160711155959.GA16111@zurbaran.home>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 17:59:59 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio@...nbossa.org>,
Aloisio Almeida Jr <aloisio.almeida@...nbossa.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Rolf Neugebauer <rolf.neugebauer@...ronome.com>,
Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard@...il.com>,
Robert Dolca <robert.dolca@...el.com>,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfp: check idx is -ENOSPC before using it is an index
Hi Colin,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 04:46:57PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c b/drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c
> index e44a7a2..d93d314 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/fdp/fdp.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static void fdp_nci_release_firmware(struct nci_dev *ndev)
>
> if (info->ram_patch) {
> release_firmware(info->ram_patch);
> - info->otp_patch = NULL;
> + info->ram_patch = NULL;
> }
> }
This chunk is unrelated and also already applied to my nfc-next tree.
Cheers,
Samuel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists