netdev - Re: [PATCH V2] Add flow control to the portmapper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160719145024.GA69464@ssaleem-MOBL4.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:50:24 -0500
From:	Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
To:	Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:	dledford@...hat.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	swise@...ngridcomputing.com, e1000-rdma@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Add flow control to the portmapper

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 08:40:06AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> 
> You are the one user of this new inline function.
> Why don't you directly call to netlink_unicast() in your ibnl_unicast()
> without messing with widely visible header file?

Since there is a non-blocking version of nlmsg_unicast(), the idea is 
to make a blocking version available to others as well as maintain 
consistency of existing code.