[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160719054006.GF20674@leon.nu>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:40:06 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Shiraz Saleem <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>
Cc: dledford@...hat.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
swise@...ngridcomputing.com, e1000-rdma@...ts.sourceforge.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Add flow control to the portmapper
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:23:30PM -0500, Shiraz Saleem wrote:
> From: Mustafa Ismail <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>
>
> During connection establishment with a large number of connections,
> it is possible that the connection requests might fail. Adding flow
> control prevents this failure. Change ibnl unicast to use netlink
> messaging with blocking to enable flow control.
You are the one user of this new inline function.
Why don't you directly call to netlink_unicast() in your ibnl_unicast()
without messing with widely visible header file?
Thanks
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists