[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1468925873.8568.47.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 20:57:53 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
"'Gavin Shan'" <gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"joel@....id.au" <joel@....id.au>,
"gerlitz.or@...il.com" <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
"weixue@...stnetic.com" <weixue@...stnetic.com>,
"yuvali@...lanox.com" <yuvali@...lanox.com>,
"alexei.starovoitov@...il.com" <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 07/10] net/faraday: Read MAC address from
chip
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 10:50 +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > + if (!is_valid_ether_addr(mac)) {
> > + mac[5] = (m >> 8) & 0xff;
> > + mac[4] = m & 0xff;
> > + mac[3] = (l >> 24) & 0xff;
> > + mac[2] = (l >> 16) & 0xff;
> > + mac[1] = (l >> 8) & 0xff;
> > + mac[0] = l & 0xff;
> > + }
> ...
>
> That is horrid, not all byte reversed addresses will be invalid.
Right, that's just a hack for a broken vendor uboot we had here, Gavin,
drop that part of the patch please.
Cheers,
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists