[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.20.1608022006070.25634@nerf40.vanv.qr>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:07:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
To: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@...el.com>
cc: Linux Networking Developer Mailing List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Netfilter Developer Mailing List
<netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
chuansheng.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1116/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with
macro
On Tuesday 2016-08-02 14:17, Baole Ni wrote:
>I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
>when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
>As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
>and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
>thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.
>
> static int ip_vs_conn_tab_bits = CONFIG_IP_VS_TAB_BITS;
>-module_param_named(conn_tab_bits, ip_vs_conn_tab_bits, int, 0444);
>+module_param_named(conn_tab_bits, ip_vs_conn_tab_bits, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
We have S_IRUGO for this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists