[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160802.105901.1278960621806579606.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: pavel@....cz
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, baolex.ni@...el.com, pablo@...filter.org,
kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu, jmorris@...ei.org,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
kyungmin.park@...sung.com, k.kozlowski@...sung.com,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
johunt@...mai.com, vpai@...mai.com, chuansheng.liu@...el.com,
aryabinin@...tuozzo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1115/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with
macro
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:47:33 +0200
> But that does not make me like the series. And yes, hiding backdoor
> in one of those would be way too easy...
This is one of the worst patch series submissions in history.
At vger.kernel.org postmaster I just spent 45 minutes dealing
with the fallout.
1200+ patches all at once, unacceptable.
Every patch having the same Subject line text, unacceptable.
Triggering rate limiting bounces on %50+ of all lkml recipients,
unacceptable.
This is why you don't spam lists with a thousand patches.
If this is going to be properly submitted, it must be done in
reasonable, bite size, pieces of 10 to 15 patches at a time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists